WASHINGTON--A legal scholar cited by Donald Trump's lawyers in arguing that it is unconstitutional to have an impeachment trial for a former president said Trump's defense team misrepresented his work "quite badly."
Michigan State University law professor Brian Kalt told Reuters in an email that his research was "definitely not" accurately described in a 78-page document filed by Trump's lawyers on Monday, the day before his second impeachment trial begins. In the brief, Trump's lawyers denied he had encouraged the deadly attack on the U.S. Capitol by hundreds of his supporters on Jan.6, while disputing the constitutionality of the trial.
Kalt, however, has joined other legal scholars in arguing the Senate trial is constitutional. "They didn’t have to be disingenuous and misleading like this," Kalt later said on Twitter, adding that "in several places, they misrepresent what I wrote quite badly."
David Schoen, one of Trump’s lawyers, said he had not intended to misrepresent Kalt's work. "Ultimately Professor Kalt did not agree with our position, but he did explain it well and we wanted to give him credit for that," Schoen told Reuters. "I can assure you that it was never our intention to in any way mislead as to Professor Kalt's position."
The charge of "incitement of insurrection" passed by the Democratic-led House of Representatives on Jan. 13 focused on Trump's speech to a crowd of supporters shortly before hundreds of them stormed the Capitol, sending lawmakers into hiding and leaving five people dead including a police officer. Trump's lawyers are seeking to convince members of the narrowly divided 100-member Senate not to convict the Republican or to bar him from again serving in public office, while Democrats contend the former president has no defense.
Conviction requires a two-thirds majority, meaning 17 Republicans would need to join the Senate's 50 Democrats in the vote. Based on preliminary votes and public comments, there appears to be little chance of that occurring.
Trump's lawyers called the trial a "brazen political act" by Democrats with a "hunger for this political theater" with the intention to "silence a political opponent and a minority party." Trump's four-year term ended on Jan. 20.
"The evidence of President Trump's conduct is overwhelming," the nine Democratic House impeachment managers, who will serve as prosecutors, wrote in a brief. "He has no valid excuse or defense for his actions."
Trump's false claims that the Nov. 3 election won by Democrat Joe Biden was stolen, and his speech before the riot have left fissures in his party. Ten House Republicans voted to impeach him. Trump's lawyers said he was speaking only in a "figurative sense" when he told followers to go to the Capitol and "fight like hell" as Congress was formally certifying Biden's election win.
Trump's use of the word "fight," the defense said, "could not be construed to encourage acts of violence."
"Notably absent from his speech was any reference to or encouragement of an insurrection, a riot, criminal action, or any acts of physical violence whatsoever," they wrote.
Trump's lawyers said he could not be held responsible for the actions of "a small group of criminals - who had come to the capital of their own accord armed and ready for a fight." Several of the roughly 200 people charged following the riot have tried to shift at least some blame onto Trump as they defend themselves in court or in the court of public opinion.
