Dear Editor,
I am a bit confused about the airport situation. Maybe you can help me clear things up:
Isn’t the outgoing CEO [chief executive officer – Ed.]:
1. A local?
2. The guy who made sure much more insurance money was paid out to the airport?
3. The person who sealed the deal with the WB/NL/EIB that our government says it is committed to?
4. So therefore the one who secured 100 million to rebuild the airport?
5. And the person who just led the bidding process which is currently underway?
And isn’t the Holding:
1.The same Holding that has been there for years even before Irma?
2. The same Holding that delayed the financing and presented so-called alternative financing?
3. The same Holding supporting the COO [chief operating officer] who actually was there also even before Irma?
4. The same Holding supporting the COO who wasn’t able to actually get financing before?
5. The same Holding supporting the COO who wasn’t able to get a good deal and pay-out from the insurance company?
So I’m confused, but is this really what I’m seeing?
Also a few other questions:
In the last election was there a political party called The Airport Holding that won the election?
Does the elected government even have a say anymore? If this is the case then can the Holding sell and privatize the airport if it wants, seeing that it seems no one can tell them otherwise?
To be honest this situation is something that I just really can’t figure out.
Name withheld upon author’s request.
